I was driving to work this morning around 10:30am (I've been working from home in the mornings for the last couple of weeks, for various reasons). I was almost to work, just getting off the interstate, and on the exit I was taking I saw state patrolman, who had pulled over some guy and was giving him a sobriety test.
I thought, "Jeesh, it's 10:30 in the morning. Who's drunk already?"
Then I saw the guy. It was the professor from my current class! I could hardly believe it! This is the most straight and narrow guy ever!
So I can't imagine I'll be having class the rest of the week, or maybe semester.
I'm having a poker tournament this saturday, and
you're invited. My numbers have been dwindling of late, I think the poker craze is about over. Especially with the death of online poker, but it looks like it's not totally dead yet. Pokerstars is claiming to
fight the new law, based on the million-year-old argument that poker is a skill game, and not a game of luck.
I would agree that skill is involved, but so is luck. Now the question becomes, what is the minimum luck/skill ratio needed to be declared a 'sport' versus a 'game'?
Backgammon is considered a skill game.
Darts is a skill game.
Pool is a skill game.
All those games have a serious amount of luck involved too, if I'm playing them. Yet it's perfectly legal for me to enter a pool league for $50 and claim a grand prize of the large pot of $50 entries if I win.
And I'll guarantee if I win, luck was involved.
Oh, and the story about my professor being pulled over and arrested for drunk driving is totally not true. I did see a guy pulled over this morning and taking a sobriety test, but that was it. I just needed a better ending.