I was perusing through DAvid's blog(s), including his additional one where he and his friend actually try to give social commentary. I tried that for awhile, but it just bored everyone, and I eventually couldn't come up with new material every day, or even every week.
It doesn't mean I don't have some now, but I strayed from just that.
But a
post on that
site, caught my attention. It was about the downloading of music, iTunes, and current CD marketing.
He makes some interesting points about how the price of CDs really hasn't fallen much, and that's largely to blame for today's music piracy and the success of iTunes and similar.
I would say that you can't say that it's price should fall just because the price of computers, and other technologies have fallen in price?
He makes a comparison to the falling price of a car, but in reality, the selling prices of cars have risen along with everything else. Costs of PC's have fallen, but that's when it's largely the same technology that doesn't incur any further research costs, and benefits from cheaper production costs as the technology matures.
Also, we're talking about something that in inherently an art form as well, not pure technology. It could charge be hard to argue what the inherent value of that is, although there seems to be a long standing precedent as to what it is, based on what the public is willing to pay.
But here's a completely separate point that he didn't address in his 'new model' that I still cannot believe hasn't been done somewhere.
I thought of this idea back in the 90's (along with several others), when the CD burners were first becoming commonplace. I was paying $9 a disc, which is crazy expensive, but still less than I was paying for music CDs. The internet was young, but fully functional. Hard drive was expensive, but basically, for ~$1000, you could get a decent PC, and plenty of hard drive space to store. As music CD store, buy this PC, and start saving all the tracks of all the music you have to hard drives.
Then only download from the music (legally) from the music labels, and burn the CDs right there in the store for the person who wants it.
Perfect, right?
They never run out of a CD (assuming they don't run out of blanks), and they don't have to carry stock in a bunch of crap that never sells. It would even be dirt simple to make compilation CDs, although that would be much trickier from the royalties to which labels, but it would surely quickly have moved to whatever model iTunes now has.
This whole great plan was thought of over 10 years ago, and would have been somewhat cost prohibitive in the 90's, but now I could open my own music store it would be so cheap. Literally anyone could do it.
So why didn't it happen?
Who would have shot down that idea?
The shipping industry.
They are moving a lot of CDs around the country, and all that revenue would disappear, instantly.
I can't remember the details, but they almost single-handedly killed the idea.
Now it's become
so cheap, the model is effectively what I suggest, just in your home.
So it happened anyway, effectively.